Your engineers build. We guide the architecture.
Advisory for companies building agent systems with their own engineering teams. We bring the patterns from production deployments: domain decomposition, governance, autonomy classification, and the infrastructure decisions that determine whether agents scale or stall. We design the blueprint. Your team builds it.
What we advise on.
Every topic is grounded in systems we have built, broken, and rebuilt in production. The guidance comes from experience, not theory.
Agent strategy
Where agents should operate in your organization, which processes can run autonomously, and which need human oversight.
Domain decomposition
Breaking operations into bounded domains with clear ownership, inputs, and outputs. The foundation that prevents the one-agent-does-everything failure.
Governance design
What runs autonomously, what requires approval, and how escalation works. Built for EU AI Act compliance from the architecture layer, not retrofitted.
Platform selection
Vendor-neutral guidance on orchestration, models, memory, and tooling. Based on production experience, not marketing material.
Team structure
How to staff for agent operations: roles, hiring profiles, and the collaboration model between engineers and agents.
Cost and observability
What to measure, what dashboards should show, and how to keep agent costs predictable instead of discovering them on the invoice.
Four ways to work together.
The format follows the problem. A new architecture wants a workshop. An existing one wants a review. A team that builds continuously wants standing advisory.
Architecture workshop
1-2 daysAn intensive working session with your engineering and operations teams. You leave with a documented architecture blueprint.
Architecture review
About a weekWe review your existing or proposed agent architecture against production patterns. You get a written assessment with specific recommendations and risk areas.
Team training
2-4 sessionsStructured training for your engineers on agent architecture patterns: decomposition, governance, autonomy classification, and operations.
Ongoing advisory
MonthlyStanding access to an architect for design reviews and technical decisions as your team builds. Guidance, not execution.
How advisory runs.
Whatever the format, the shape is the same: frame the problem, work it with your team, and leave the decisions in writing.
Frame
First sessionWe define the problem, agree the format, and gather the context your architecture has to survive: systems, constraints, regulation, team.
Work
Core sessionsWorkshops, reviews, or training with your team. Every session works on your real architecture, not abstract examples.
Document
CloseYou receive the blueprint, decision records, and recommendations in writing. Your team builds against them at their own pace.
Scoped to the problem.
Advisory engagements vary too much for a single price. We scope the format and effort with you, then fix the price in writing before work begins.
- Scoped and priced per engagement, fixed before work begins.
- Advisory can convert into a System Build if you want us to implement parts of the blueprint.
- All deliverables are vendor-neutral and remain yours.
Building it yourselves?
Bring your architecture questions to a call. If advisory is not the right format, we will tell you what is.